Grid structure - Revision history

Pstch at 10:39, 22 August 2019

2019-08-22T10:39:47Z

Pstch at 10:37, 22 August 2019

2019-08-22T10:37:36Z

Pstch at 10:36, 22 August 2019

2019-08-22T10:36:37Z

Pstch at 09:54, 22 August 2019

2019-08-22T09:54:11Z

Pstch: Add headings

2019-08-22T09:53:52Z

Add headings

Pstch: Formatting fixes

2019-08-22T09:53:11Z

Formatting fixes

Pstch: Created page with "'''NOTE:''' ''This document is a draft, and it has been written by someone who may not have the required knowledge and experience in both PV-systems and electrical engineering..."

2019-08-22T09:52:24Z

Created page with "'''NOTE:''' ''This document is a draft, and it has been written by someone who may not have the required knowledge and experience in both PV-systems and electrical engineering..."

New page

'''NOTE:''' ''This document is a draft, and it has been written by someone who may not have the required knowledge and experience in both PV-systems and electrical engineering. Feel free to correct mistakes, or to delete nonsensical content.''

There are multiple ways to structure the micro-grid, some of which were mentioned in the D1 Micro-grid meet-up at CCCamp2019. These different structures depend on the scale of the grid (in terms of power, distance, and availability), but also on safety requirements and existing regulations, which determine what can be done practically.

1. Long-distance interconnections

Very low voltage DC can not be carried very far, as the voltage drop implies a huge loss in efficiency. Multiple solutions were mentioned for this problem :

- High(er) Voltage DC, around ~300V : tricky to work with (expensive equipment required), and not very safe (DC is hard to break, especially at such voltages), and requires a licensed electrician
- Standard 230V AC : hard to synchronize properly, but already standardized. Sync problems can be avoided by only using unidirectional point-to-point links. The interconnection would present itself as a DC consumer to one side, and as a DC provider to the other. This way, standard, off-the-shelf equipment can be used.
- "Sneaker-grid" : carrying batteries using mechanical/human power

It may be useful to exchange data (supply, load, battery level, etc) between these subgrids. In that case, standard 230V AC would be practical, as it allows PLC using off-the-shelf equipment.

2. Short-distance interconnections

Short-distance interconnections can be done directly using DC current. Because of this, it may be useful to use a standard voltage. 42V was used at SHA2017, but 48V is a good candidate too (multiple of 12, lower than 60V). Even with DC interconnection there are lots of variations possible :

- The current flow can be bidirectional, or restricted to a single direction using diodes.
- The connection can be passive, or active (opening the circuit when required, based on loads/supplies on each side of the connection)

As these connections would not necessarily be point-to-point, it may be easier to conceptualize them as point-to-point links to a shared bus, which can be seen as battery. The diodes/switches would then be placed on the links to the shared bus. Designing and sizing this bus can be tricky (but very important) : ideally it needs to be able to carry the totality of the current supply, which could imply a big cable diameter. It may be possible to size the bus to less than the theoretical maximum current supply, but this would require some additional safety systems.

It should also be noted that the fault current calculation is more complex when there are multiple power sources

For active connections, it may be useful to exchange data between subgrids, for which a transmission method has to be determined. During the meeting, it was said that DC PLC is harder to do safely, as one would have to separate the signal from the relatively high DC currents.

A quick look on the internet suggests that DC PLC is also possible. [This paper](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/22348972.2016.1217817) describes a DC PLC modem for PV cell monitoring.

3. PV-system interconnection

The previous section covers short-distance subgrid interconnection, where each subgrid can be seen as a battery, but does not provide a solution for inter-grid PV-system interconnection (a concrete problem encountered by many at CCCamp 2019). Solutions to this problem were not discussed.

* A possible solution could be to avoid using batteries for each PV controller, and instead use batteries on the shared bus. This also makes the system "simpler", as the shared bus is already mentally modeled as a battery. This would require a load/supply management circuit at the batteries. Note that "power availability" cannot be solely determined from the actual load : if some batteries are charging, there is "available power", but it would not be apparent in the bus voltage. Because of this, this load/supply management circuit would need to communicate an "available power" metric to the possible loads/users. Also, this load/supply management circuit would have to be able to control the generators (PV systems) in order to avoid excess supply when batteries are full, unless this excess supply can always be used by some Power-to-X load. It may be possible to use the bus voltage to communicate this situation to the generators, but the load/supply management circuit may be more efficient if it has a precise idea of the state of all generators (independently from the loads), which cannot be communicated by the shared bus voltage. The disadvantage of this solution is that it requires an additional battery charging circuit (+ the load/supply management system), because the existing PV-systems battery charging circuits can not be made to work with this shared bus.

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 * The connection can be passive, or active (opening the circuit when required, based on loads/supplies on each side of the connection)
-Then, there are two ways to interconnect the sub-grids :
+As these connections would not necessarily be point-to-point, it may be easier to conceptualize them as point-to-point links to a shared bus, which can be seen as battery. The diodes/switches would then be placed on the links to the shared bus. Designing and sizing this bus can be tricky (but very important) : ideally it needs to be able to carry the totality of the current supply, which could imply a big cable diameter. It may be possible to size the bus to less than the theoretical maximum current supply, but this would require some additional safety systems.
-* Mesh-like structure : point-to-(multi)point links between the sub-grids
+It should also be noted that the fault current calculation is more complex when there are multiple power sources
-Using this shared bus could help simplify the mental model and safety systems :
+For active connections, it may be useful to exchange data between subgrids, for which a transmission method has to be determined. During the meeting, it was said that DC PLC is harder to do safely, as one would have to separate the signal from the relatively high DC currents.
-* Fault current calculation in a mesh-like structure can be tricky, and so designing the safety systems could be much harder (and more expensive).
+A quick look on the internet suggests that DC PLC is also possible. [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/22348972.2016.1217817 This paper] describes a DC PLC modem for PV cell monitoring.
 == PV-system interconnection ==
@@ Line 40: / Line 32: @@
 The previous section covers short-distance subgrid interconnection, where each subgrid can be seen as a battery, but does not provide a solution for inter-grid PV-system interconnection (a concrete problem encountered by many at CCCamp 2019). Solutions to this problem were not discussed.
-* A possible solution could be to avoid using batteries for each PV controller, and instead use a battery bank on the shared bus. Again, this creates a SPOF. This also makes the system "simpler", as the shared bus is already mentally modeled as a battery. This would require a load/supply controller  at the batteries. Note that "power availability" cannot be solely determined from the actual load : if some batteries are charging, there is "available power", but it would not be apparent in the bus voltage. Because of this, this load/supply management circuit would need to communicate an "available power" metric to the possible loads/users. Also, this load/supply controllers would have to be able to control the generators (PV systems) in order to avoid excess supply when batteries are full, unless this excess supply can always be used by some Power-to-X load. It may be possible to use the bus voltage to communicate this situation to the generators, but the load/supply controller may be more efficient if it has a precise idea of the state of all generators (independently from the loads), which cannot be communicated by the shared bus voltage. The disadvantage of this solution is that it requires an additional battery charging circuit (+ the load/supply management system), because the existing PV-systems battery charging circuits can probably not be made to work with this shared bus.
+* A possible solution could be to avoid using batteries for each PV controller, and instead use batteries on the shared bus. This also makes the system "simpler", as the shared bus is already mentally modeled as a battery. This would require a load/supply management circuit at the batteries. Note that "power availability" cannot be solely determined from the actual load : if some batteries are charging, there is "available power", but it would not be apparent in the bus voltage. Because of this, this load/supply management circuit would need to communicate an "available power" metric to the possible loads/users. Also, this load/supply management circuit would have to be able to control the generators (PV systems) in order to avoid excess supply when batteries are full, unless this excess supply can always be used by some Power-to-X load. It may be possible to use the bus voltage to communicate this situation to the generators, but the load/supply management circuit may be more efficient if it has a precise idea of the state of all generators (independently from the loads), which cannot be communicated by the shared bus voltage. The disadvantage of this solution is that it requires an additional battery charging circuit (+ the load/supply management system), because the existing PV-systems battery charging circuits can not be made to work with this shared bus.

@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 The previous section covers short-distance subgrid interconnection, where each subgrid can be seen as a battery, but does not provide a solution for inter-grid PV-system interconnection (a concrete problem encountered by many at CCCamp 2019). Solutions to this problem were not discussed.
-* A possible solution could be to avoid using batteries for each PV controller, and instead use a battery bank on the shared bus. Again, this creates a SPOF. This also makes the system "simpler", as the shared bus is already mentally modeled as a battery. This would require a load/supply controller  at the batteries. Note that "power availability" cannot be solely determined from the actual load : if some batteries are charging, there is "available power", but it would not be apparent in the bus voltage. Because of this, this load/supply management circuit would need to communicate an "available power" metric to the possible loads/users. Also, this load/supply controllers would have to be able to control the generators (PV systems) in order to avoid excess supply when batteries are full, unless this excess supply can always be used by some Power-to-X load. It may be possible to use the bus voltage to communicate this situation to the generators, but the load/supply controller may be more efficient if it has a precise idea of the state of all generators (independently from the loads), which cannot be communicated by the shared bus voltage. The disadvantage of this solution is that it requires an additional battery charging circuit (+ the load/supply management system), because the existing PV-systems battery charging circuits can not be made to work with this shared bus.
+* A possible solution could be to avoid using batteries for each PV controller, and instead use a battery bank on the shared bus. Again, this creates a SPOF. This also makes the system "simpler", as the shared bus is already mentally modeled as a battery. This would require a load/supply controller  at the batteries. Note that "power availability" cannot be solely determined from the actual load : if some batteries are charging, there is "available power", but it would not be apparent in the bus voltage. Because of this, this load/supply management circuit would need to communicate an "available power" metric to the possible loads/users. Also, this load/supply controllers would have to be able to control the generators (PV systems) in order to avoid excess supply when batteries are full, unless this excess supply can always be used by some Power-to-X load. It may be possible to use the bus voltage to communicate this situation to the generators, but the load/supply controller may be more efficient if it has a precise idea of the state of all generators (independently from the loads), which cannot be communicated by the shared bus voltage. The disadvantage of this solution is that it requires an additional battery charging circuit (+ the load/supply management system), because the existing PV-systems battery charging circuits can probably not be made to work with this shared bus.
 * It should be possible to have multiple battery banks on the shared bus (eliminating the battery-bank-SPOF, but not the shared-bus-SPOF) if the load/supply circuits for each bank can properly cooperate. In that case, and if the load/supply controller communicates the excess supply situation to the PV-systems using the bus voltage, the voltage drop will have to be taken in account, and could even make this approach infeasible, requiring OOB communication between PV-systems and load/supply controllers.
 * It should also be possible to have multiple battery banks in a mesh-like structure (eliminating both SPOFs), but the load/supply controllers would have to be aware of the mesh structure and of its capacity (the definition of "available power" becomes much more complex, because it has to take in account the limitations of the path. in a shared bus structure, the "available power" is a byzantine problem (everyone has the same view of it), while in a mesh-like structure, "available power" has a different definition for each node of the mesh).

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 Short-distance interconnections can be done directly using DC current. Because of this, it may be useful to use a standard voltage. 42V was used at SHA2017, but 48V is a good candidate too (multiple of 12, lower than 60V). Even with DC interconnection there are lots of variations possible :
- - The current flow can be bidirectional, or restricted to a single direction using diodes.
+* The current flow can be bidirectional, or restricted to a single direction using diodes.
- - The connection can be passive, or active (opening the circuit when required, based on loads/supplies on each side of the connection)
+* The connection can be passive, or active (opening the circuit when required, based on loads/supplies on each side of the connection)
-As these connections would not necessarily be point-to-point, it may be easier to conceptualize them as point-to-point links to a shared bus, which can be seen as battery. The diodes/switches would then be placed on the links to the shared bus. Designing and sizing this bus can be tricky (but very important) : ideally it needs to be able to carry the totality of the current supply, which could imply a big cable diameter. It may be possible to size the bus to less than the theoretical maximum current supply, but this would require some additional safety systems.
+Then, there are two ways to interconnect the sub-grids :
-It should also be noted that the fault current calculation is more complex when there are multiple power sources
+* Mesh-like structure : point-to-(multi)point links between the sub-grids
-For active connections, it may be useful to exchange data between subgrids, for which a transmission method has to be determined. During the meeting, it was said that DC PLC is harder to do safely, as one would have to separate the signal from the relatively high DC currents.
+Using this shared bus could help simplify the mental model and safety systems :
-A quick look on the internet suggests that DC PLC is also possible. [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/22348972.2016.1217817 This paper] describes a DC PLC modem for PV cell monitoring.
+* Fault current calculation in a mesh-like structure can be tricky, and so designing the safety systems could be much harder (and more expensive).
 == PV-system interconnection ==
@@ Line 32: / Line 40: @@
 The previous section covers short-distance subgrid interconnection, where each subgrid can be seen as a battery, but does not provide a solution for inter-grid PV-system interconnection (a concrete problem encountered by many at CCCamp 2019). Solutions to this problem were not discussed.
-* A possible solution could be to avoid using batteries for each PV controller, and instead use batteries on the shared bus. This also makes the system "simpler", as the shared bus is already mentally modeled as a battery. This would require a load/supply management circuit at the batteries. Note that "power availability" cannot be solely determined from the actual load : if some batteries are charging, there is "available power", but it would not be apparent in the bus voltage. Because of this, this load/supply management circuit would need to communicate an "available power" metric to the possible loads/users. Also, this load/supply management circuit would have to be able to control the generators (PV systems) in order to avoid excess supply when batteries are full, unless this excess supply can always be used by some Power-to-X load. It may be possible to use the bus voltage to communicate this situation to the generators, but the load/supply management circuit may be more efficient if it has a precise idea of the state of all generators (independently from the loads), which cannot be communicated by the shared bus voltage. The disadvantage of this solution is that it requires an additional battery charging circuit (+ the load/supply management system), because the existing PV-systems battery charging circuits can not be made to work with this shared bus.
+* A possible solution could be to avoid using batteries for each PV controller, and instead use a battery bank on the shared bus. Again, this creates a SPOF. This also makes the system "simpler", as the shared bus is already mentally modeled as a battery. This would require a load/supply controller  at the batteries. Note that "power availability" cannot be solely determined from the actual load : if some batteries are charging, there is "available power", but it would not be apparent in the bus voltage. Because of this, this load/supply management circuit would need to communicate an "available power" metric to the possible loads/users. Also, this load/supply controllers would have to be able to control the generators (PV systems) in order to avoid excess supply when batteries are full, unless this excess supply can always be used by some Power-to-X load. It may be possible to use the bus voltage to communicate this situation to the generators, but the load/supply controller may be more efficient if it has a precise idea of the state of all generators (independently from the loads), which cannot be communicated by the shared bus voltage. The disadvantage of this solution is that it requires an additional battery charging circuit (+ the load/supply management system), because the existing PV-systems battery charging circuits can not be made to work with this shared bus.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:54, 22 August 2019
Line 32:		Line 32:
	The previous section covers short-distance subgrid interconnection, where each subgrid can be seen as a battery, but does not provide a solution for inter-grid PV-system interconnection (a concrete problem encountered by many at CCCamp 2019). Solutions to this problem were not discussed.		The previous section covers short-distance subgrid interconnection, where each subgrid can be seen as a battery, but does not provide a solution for inter-grid PV-system interconnection (a concrete problem encountered by many at CCCamp 2019). Solutions to this problem were not discussed.

−	* A possible solution could be to avoid using batteries for each PV controller, and instead use batteries on the shared bus. This also makes the system "simpler", as the shared bus is already mentally modeled as a battery. This would require a load/supply management circuit at the batteries. Note that "power availability" cannot be solely determined from the actual load : if some batteries are charging, there is "available power", but it would not be apparent in the bus voltage. Because of this, this load/supply management circuit would need to communicate an "available power" metric to the possible loads/users. Also, this load/supply management circuit would have to be able to control the generators (PV systems) in order to avoid excess supply when batteries are full, unless this excess supply can always be used by some Power-to-X load. It may be possible to use the bus voltage to communicate this situation to the generators, but the load/supply management circuit may be more efficient if it has a precise idea of the state of all generators (independently from the loads), which cannot be communicated by the shared bus voltage. The disadvantage of this solution is that it requires an additional battery charging circuit (+ the load/supply management system), because the existing PV-systems battery charging circuits can not be made to work with this shared bus.	+	* A possible solution could be to avoid using batteries for each PV controller, and instead use batteries on the shared bus. This also makes the system "simpler", as the shared bus is already mentally modeled as a battery. This would require a load/supply management circuit at the batteries. Note that "power availability" cannot be solely determined from the actual load : if some batteries are charging, there is "available power", but it would not be apparent in the bus voltage. Because of this, this load/supply management circuit would need to communicate an "available power" metric to the possible loads/users. Also, this load/supply management circuit would have to be able to control the generators (PV systems) in order to avoid excess supply when batteries are full, unless this excess supply can always be used by some Power-to-X load. It may be possible to use the bus voltage to communicate this situation to the generators, but the load/supply management circuit may be more efficient if it has a precise idea of the state of all generators (independently from the loads), which cannot be communicated by the shared bus voltage. The disadvantage of this solution is that it requires an additional battery charging circuit (+ the load/supply management system), because the existing PV-systems battery charging circuits can not be made to work with this shared bus.

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 There are multiple ways to structure the micro-grid, some of which were mentioned in the D1 Micro-grid meet-up at CCCamp2019. These different structures depend on the scale of the grid (in terms of power, distance, and availability), but also on safety requirements and existing regulations, which determine what can be done practically.
-. Long-distance interconnections
+== Long-distance interconnections ==
 Very low voltage DC can not be carried very far, as the voltage drop implies a huge loss in efficiency. Multiple solutions were mentioned for this problem :
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 It may be useful to exchange data (supply, load, battery level, etc) between these subgrids. In that case, standard 230V AC would be practical, as it allows PLC using off-the-shelf equipment.
-. Short-distance interconnections
+== Short-distance interconnections ==
 Short-distance interconnections can be done directly using DC current. Because of this, it may be useful to use a standard voltage. 42V was used at SHA2017, but 48V is a good candidate too (multiple of 12, lower than 60V). Even with DC interconnection there are lots of variations possible :
@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 A quick look on the internet suggests that DC PLC is also possible. [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/22348972.2016.1217817 This paper] describes a DC PLC modem for PV cell monitoring.
-. PV-system interconnection
+== PV-system interconnection ==
 The previous section covers short-distance subgrid interconnection, where each subgrid can be seen as a battery, but does not provide a solution for inter-grid PV-system interconnection (a concrete problem encountered by many at CCCamp 2019). Solutions to this problem were not discussed.
   * A possible solution could be to avoid using batteries for each PV controller, and instead use batteries on the shared bus. This also makes the system "simpler", as the shared bus is already mentally modeled as a battery. This would require a load/supply management circuit at the batteries. Note that "power availability" cannot be solely determined from the actual load : if some batteries are charging, there is "available power", but it would not be apparent in the bus voltage. Because of this, this load/supply management circuit would need to communicate an "available power" metric to the possible loads/users. Also, this load/supply management circuit would have to be able to control the generators (PV systems) in order to avoid excess supply when batteries are full, unless this excess supply can always be used by some Power-to-X load. It may be possible to use the bus voltage to communicate this situation to the generators, but the load/supply management circuit may be more efficient if it has a precise idea of the state of all generators (independently from the loads), which cannot be communicated by the shared bus voltage. The disadvantage of this solution is that it requires an additional battery charging circuit (+ the load/supply management system), because the existing PV-systems battery charging circuits can not be made to work with this shared bus.

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 Very low voltage DC can not be carried very far, as the voltage drop implies a huge loss in efficiency. Multiple solutions were mentioned for this problem :
- - High(er) Voltage DC, around ~300V : tricky to work with (expensive equipment required), and not very safe (DC is hard to break, especially at such voltages), and requires a licensed electrician
+* '''High(er) Voltage DC, around ~300V''' : tricky to work with (expensive equipment required), and not very safe (DC is hard to break, especially at such voltages), and requires a licensed electrician
- - Standard 230V AC : hard to synchronize properly, but already standardized. Sync problems can be avoided by only using unidirectional point-to-point links. The interconnection would present itself as a DC consumer to one side, and as a DC provider to the other. This way, standard, off-the-shelf equipment can be used.
+* '''Standard 230V AC''' : hard to synchronize properly, but already standardized. Sync problems can be avoided by only using unidirectional point-to-point links. The interconnection would present itself as a DC consumer to one side, and as a DC provider to the other. This way, standard, off-the-shelf equipment can be used.
- - "Sneaker-grid" : carrying batteries using mechanical/human power
+* '''"Sneaker-grid"''' : carrying batteries using mechanical/human power
 It may be useful to exchange data (supply, load, battery level, etc) between these subgrids. In that case, standard 230V AC would be practical, as it allows PLC using off-the-shelf equipment.
@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 For active connections, it may be useful to exchange data between subgrids, for which a transmission method has to be determined. During the meeting, it was said that DC PLC is harder to do safely, as one would have to separate the signal from the relatively high DC currents.
-A quick look on the internet suggests that DC PLC is also possible. [This paper](https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/22348972.2016.1217817) describes a DC PLC modem for PV cell monitoring.
+A quick look on the internet suggests that DC PLC is also possible. [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/22348972.2016.1217817 This paper] describes a DC PLC modem for PV cell monitoring.
 . PV-system interconnection